On the tailplane the right side line is the housing for the trim tab operating mechanism, there is a centre hinge bracket
between the two drawn lines and a third bracket is inboard of the trim box.
The Handley Page Hastings was by far and large a very robust and successful aircraft giving 30 years
of service in the RAF/RNZAF. The serviceability of the aircraft was generally good and often a flight engineer would not have
too many 'snags' to report to a 'grease monkey' upon an afterflight inspection.
However one cause for concern over
the lifetime of the Hastings was in the tailplane section where the elevator hinge section was attached to the tailplane,
in fact for the majority of the Hastings built it was the 'end of the line' for the Hastybird when TG577 took off with a total
of 41 crew and parachutists on board on 06/07/1965. Within minutes of being airborne TG577 plummeted to earth with sadly the
loss of all on board. A couple of days later all Hastings were temporarily grounded pending a Court of Inquiry report, this
resulted in the failure of the hinge bolt bracket that connected the elevator to the tailplane being fatigued. Subsequent
checks found at least 3 other bracket failures and modifications were put into place immediately and within 2 years most of
the Hastings were replaced by Lockheed Hercules transport aircraft. My last flight was in one such Hastings of Strike Command
in 1968 from Wattisham to Coningsby and return supporting 29 (F) Lightning Squadron.
It is known that over the years
that at least 5 Hastings crashed due to elevator problems, some of these accident reports and other Hastings accidents, where
the cause is unknown, have their accident record cards missing. The mystery surrounding the lack of information regarding
the TG579 crash at Gan raises doubts on what or who was to blame for this accident.
I will state here and now that
I have no proof that TG579's demise was caused by elevator or any other technical malfunction, the answer here lies at the
bottom of the Indian Ocean, but consider the possibilities:-
1> The pilot of TG579 F/L Bob Scott was a highly experienced
pilot with over 5000 flying hours experience with 3500 of those hours in flying Hastings type, he was classified as an above
average pilot and held a Master Green Rated Certificate for instrument flying.
2> Two eyewitness reports, one the
Duty Officer at Gan on the night of the accident saw the aircraft suddenly drop from 400 ft, the other who helped set up the
Board of Inquiry from 224 Group Headquarters recalls the sudden drop from near 500 ft.
3> There was no intention
of ditching the aircraft into the sea as the undercarriage was down and locked. The visibility was 1.5 nautical miles so the
refraction theory that so many have spoken about could not have existed as the SAR Shackleton took off, searched and found
survivors and landed again in the same conditions as Scott was experiencing.
4> The accident report (and newspaper
reports from that time) states that the pilot was blinded by a brilliant flash of lightning (most lightning is brilliant!)
but it does not state that the co-pilot was affected by this flash so why did TG579 drop like a stone.
5> My theory
is that the aircraft was under extreme buffeting from the storm and it must have been difficult for the pilots to control
the stability of the aircraft but did this buffeting weaken the elevator hinge bracket to such an extent that the bracket
failed and the aircraft dropped.
6> The accident card shows that the aircraft was flying at 420 ft., and at a speed
of 125 knots which means that 2 seconds would have elapsed from the time of failure to the aircraft hitting the sea, not even
time for the aircraft to have taken a nose down attitude and hardly enough time for the pilots to draw breath!
7>
None of the passengers and two of the crew were not aware of any problem until we had hit the sea.
Two airframe fitters
recall the modifications made to the hinge bracket mechanism, over a ten year period and both worked at Changi on ASF or 48
Squadron so it is known that there was an ongoing problem, it is also interesting to note that TG577 with the fatalities,
that the hinge bracket was strengthened just after the demise of TG579! One of the fitters recalls " The modification that
I carried out consisted of fitting preshaped doubler plates at the rearmost point of the elevator outrigger bracket. Which
in itself was a light alloy forging bolted to the rear spar of the tailplane. It was about 15 inches long, about 7 inches
deep at the spar end tapering to about 3 inches at the end where the elevators were hinged. There were possibly two lightening
holes over its length. It was rigid in its vertical plane but it could be flexed if sideways pressure was applied. I think
the original failure had been at the point on this outrigger where the attachment bolt was fitted, joining this to the elevator.
We fitted doubler plates to top and bottom flanges of this bit and I think fitted longer, high tensile bolts".
A groundcrew member working on one such Hastings on a turn round of 48 Squadron in 1960 at RAF Gan
happened to touch the elevator which then swung lose, it is thought that if this aircraft had taken off without rectification/modification
taking place then another fatal accident would have occurred, this is recalled by Keith Greenwood on Gan at that time.
A similar incident happened to a Flight Engineer from 24 Squadron at Fayid in Egypt in the early
1950's, when checking the tailplane on a before flight examination, he feels sure that had he not put his shoulder under the
tailplane to check for movement his next flight could have ended in a disaster, as one of the bolts had sheared off.
TG577 Crash near Abingdon July 1965. I have had several people get in touch with me regarding this
accident including four family members of the deceased crew, if you do have information regarding this crash please forward
it on the 'contact me' address on the title bar.
Sent in by Doug Adams in October 2005
Having read most of the material about the Hastings and its elevator problem(s),
and working out that this issue was known about or at least suspected for a number of
years, it seems a little odd (cavalier) that these
aircraft were being used to provide
large groups of teenagers (Air Training Corps specifically)
with flying experience certainly
up to 1960. I know, because I went on one from
RAF Colerne! I was going to use
the expression 'joy ride' but this it certainly was not. Cold, noisy, rattly
and facing
backwards (safe I know), it was like an old (1940's) bus going slowly up a steep hill